Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Your collerction of 9/11 conspiracy theories requires a sh*tloasd of complicated, convoluted assumptions, none of which stand up to scrutiny. Your latest about the hijackers not being able can't hit the broad side of a barn, when in fact I quoted experts saying
"Experts say any pilot with basic training could keep a 757 or 767 on a level course. However maneuvering a plane to change its flight path or navigate the craft in changing weather conditions would require months of additional training and experience.
I simply proposed the hijackers forcing the crew to do the more difficult "vast command of navigation techniques as well as in-depth knowledge of their myriad systems, from hydraulics to the autopilot."
Much simpler to accomplish. They not only hijacked the plane, but also the pilot and co-pilot.
Occam's razor rules
|
Isn't the official story that the hijackers overcame the flight crew and FLEW THE PLANES INTO THE BUILDING?
I have never read an official account where the hijackers forced the pilot/co-pilot to fly basically right to the point where they could take over. That makes absolutely zero sense anyway. You don't think one of the pilots would have done SOMETHING to make it difficult for them to strike the buildings once it became clear to them what was going to happen? Because for your scenario to even be remotely true, those pilots would have had to get those planes in such a position that it would be more than obvious to them what was going to happen next.
It appears that you, like the rest of the 9/11 conspiracy theorists, are now making up your own narrative to answer a puzzling question.
