Quote:
Originally Posted by jameegray1
In what was deemed to be two separate incidents;  was first DQ'd behind  but then was DQ'd behind 
Result at post was:
1st 8
2nd 6 7 (DH)
4th 5
5th 3
DQ's are dealt with in order of occurrence;
> Firstly 6 was DQ'd behind 5, leaving 8/7/5/6/3
> Then 5 was DQ'd behind 3, leaving the final result 8/7/6/3/5 |
IMO the order of finish should be 8-7-4-3-2-10-1-5-6
Even though the chronology of the alleged incidents was
then
By rule the
can NEVER be allowed to be placed in front of a singular horse he fouled.
As I stated before. If it was me. I would not have changed the
's placing. I didn't see him cost anyone an opportunity at a better placing.
VERY INTERESTING RACE.
If you think that one was tough. Try this one on for size from this summer at Energy Downs in Gillette Wy
Spoiler alert. The
was placed 2nd and the
placed 3rd in the single most ludicrous Stewards decision in the history of pari-mutuel racing..
