|
I disagree. I think it is very important that non-outcome determinative fouls be dealt with via suspensions and fines.
It would be entirely unfair to bettors to disqualify a horse who would have won anyway for a foul. California's rule is the right one.
Now, is it always correctly applied? No. But you don't solve this problem by disqualifying horses who would have won anyway for jockey tactics.
|
