Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman
On a similar note, I'd like to see standardized parameters and definitions of running styles, for purposes of profiling and comparing different surfaces.
The ones I use are personalized and quirky, thus rendering track-to-track comparisons impossible, so a standard "language" would be helpful. Some might think Brisnet has already become the standard?
And in one context, I mean "language" literally. The terms "stalker" and "presser," for instance, tend to get conflated, confused, and reversed, having no standardized definition-at least that I'm aware of.
|
We have that in TimeformUS. Not sure I'd want to share for standardization purposes though.
One of our styles is "Plodder" which apparently offended some people the beginning but I stuck to my guns. Horses with that label return less than 50 cents on the dollar last I checked.
