Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
What is wrong with it is the vast majority of people would opt not to play the bet if they knew three "alls" were part of it, but there was very little time to cancel.
And actually, it wasn't according to the rules. And you can watch the pool size shrink after the announcement. It would have shrunk a lot more if time was given.
http://twitter.com/PatCummingsTIF/st...74317958971393 |
yikes
I didn't know of the Cummings cancel rule.
One discussion is whether the rules were followed, but there's also a discussion on the rules themselves. Do the rules need amending?
The State commission or whatever varies between being a scapegoat and an entity that isn't as nuanced in Horse Racing as specialists and enthusiasts.
The Stewards have consistently proven themselves of mediocre competence.
That leaves it up to the insiders to speak out, or the players to speak up.
This brain power train isn't exactly firing on all cylinders, but I don't even know exactly how I feel about a P5 being changed to a Double-&-3'ALLs'.
My gut says "WTF?! Refund! That! Sh*t!!
".
However, I have not thought it through. Maybe someone who has can share some insight on both sides?
My gut needs some Metamucil and even a strong reaction in the abdomen isn't always a solid one.
