|
Related to the thread on Benter, what appears to be value is often not because others have inside knowledge about these horses that you don't have but that info winds up being reflected on the board.
That's the giant "hole" in the odds line approach.
Your odds line reflects the information you have and the data/figures you are using, but sometimes what you have is incomplete or in error. So what appears to be good value is not.
The trick (no easy task) is knowing when you know something that is not reflected on the board but should be.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
|
