Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
I find that one impossible to believe if he were playing every race.
|
using the 67.1% ITM, the max. consecutive probable losses = 8
if we use 50% to cut some slack for era difference and random race selection = 13
In order for the max. probable consecutive losses to be 22, the hit% would equal 34% (which is closer to typical favorite win% than ITM)
so, yea, he was
improbably unlucky if true, or story was conflated with consecutive losing favorites.
