Quote:
Originally Posted by kjb320
Thankyou all for your detailed responses; very helpful! I plan on buying a TI-82 for use at that track now and will use excel when ‘capping from home. One last question though for you though CJ- why do you suggest 9 feet per beaten length than the 10 feet pbl suggested by Brohamer in Modern Pace Handicapping? Have there been more recent studies since he updated it in 2000 that shows 9 feet is more accurate? Thanks again everyone for your help!
|
According to Charles Carroll in his book Speed Handicapping, eight feet would be the best number to use in reality. But using that or 10 feet will give you misleading times. I checked it many times using video editing software and 9 in the way to go.
