Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 12-20-2016, 10:30 AM   #60
johnhannibalsmith
Registered User
 
johnhannibalsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,402
The duct-tape answer here seems reasonably obvious. If the testing outlined in this case is more or less protocol, then just establish thresholds that disqualify a horse on the final round of out of competition tests from competing. Don't punish the trainer, he/she hasn't failed a test. But the horse is ineligible. Announce the positive. If connections really decide that they want to stay the disqualification by sending the split out and get destroyed in venues like this for the decision to press on and compete, obviously the post-race testing penalties apply, including in my perfect world a much lengthier ban from the event in the future for the connections in general. Horse protected, bettors protected, trainer protected, various acronyms protected. At least a little better than this predictable nonsense when you have out of competition testing being employed as some kind of lame stalking horse.
__________________
"You make me feel like I am fun again."

-Robert James Smith, 1989
johnhannibalsmith is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.