Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
I hope I made sense with this. If not, feel free to ask again.
|
Yes, I understood thanks. I was thinking of something more specific but I should have been clearer in my post. I was wanting to know the reason(s) for the differences between the factors that make up the 1-2-3 objects (like PSR1) and the list of FT Best Scores in P&P. Was it due to a change in data (the more recent set being significantly different from the P&P set) or was the change in preferred factors due to the statistical method? (I believe you used step-wise regression in 1-2-3.) Perhaps the answer is covered later on in the seminar but I am only in Lesson 2.
