Quote:
That's why I qualified the statement with "clearly", as in a distinct step back rather than a questionable one.
|
I'm not sure if you look at multiple sets of figures, but we are talking about significantly different views in this case. That's why I pointed it out.
This kind of stuff is a pet peeve of mine. It's not that I think I can do better, but if you use figures as an important input you will often interpret race results (and create betting lines) that are dramatically different depending on whose figures you use. So IMO it's worth noting these differences when they occur before pulling the trigger on a bet.