Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 08-10-2018, 10:29 PM   #45
Dave Schwartz
 
Dave Schwartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
All three of us can partner up...and we'll call ourselves the "Unholy Trinity".
What impresses me the most about this is PA's ability to get something working very quickly. (Bear in mind that I have no idea what he is doing and have had absolutely zero to do with his success.)

I've offered my help on many occasions to help him take it to the next level. I think I even wrote about how we use "Studies" to determine what's right and what's wrong.

Some months back I took an online course about METRICS. Boy, was it enlightening.

I've been familiar with things such as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and dashboards, but this course taught me some very important things.

For example, one of the lessons was about what they called "vanity metrics." That's like looking at the size of your email list and saying, "See how big my email list is? I'm doing so well."

Instead, they said that you should be looking at the daily growth of your email list.

MY point is that there are always metrics you can look at to improve your results. Again, an example is in order.

Once we get data into the "study" (which takes literally a single button click when you bet the race), we could use an option we call, "Betfair."

What this does is turn every race into a betting exchange situation. Thus, every horse is either a "take" or a "lay" bet. The system wagers the theoretical "optimum bet" either way.

In other words, when you've got a horse as a really bad bet, how would that work out for you?

Now, the naive player thinks that the only thing that matters is who he bets, and that is true once you've got a system built. But during the development process knowing whether you are playing against the right horses is likely to make a huge difference.

In PA's case, I'd suggest that he concentrate on the low-medium odds horses he is betting. Are they actually good bets? If we divide them into expected early or late, do we see a pattern?

Of the roughly 4,000 factors in the system, which factors would have pushed him off losers and/or onto winners?

The potential for improvement is just huge.

Just my opinion.
Dave Schwartz is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.