Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 08-16-2022, 05:49 PM   #234
MargieRose
Registered User
 
MargieRose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,905
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost View Post
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHGrzoS9AbE

Here’s a longer version that gives context. Schumer’s remarks were directed more at Republicans in general than Kavanaugh or Gorsuch in particular. “Reap the whirlwind “ refers to the coming election, not violence against any person.

That speech by Schumer took place in March. The threat to Kavanaugh occurred in June-three months later. There is no evidence that the man arrested near the Kavanaugh residence, who was from California, was at that rally. It’s ridiculous to think he was inspired by a three month old speech that he probably never heard.

There were no violent demonstrations even after the official ruling came down. No property damage by demonstrators. No personal threats connected to protesters

Unlike Jan. 6, where there was a direct connection between the President’s speech and the attack on the Capitol. An attack in which scores of police officers were injured and public officials were threatened with hanging.
Quote:
18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading. Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt. (Added Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §31(a), 64 Stat. 1018; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Schumer clearly broke the law, as stated above, with his intentional intimidating and threatening remarks right in front of the SC building. Each and every one of the home paraders broke the same law, as well. But, but, but...where is the punishment?

I have yet to be shown what law Trump broke, when he said: "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."...speaking at the Ellipse, a 52-acre park south of the White House fence.

Your comparisons make no sense!
MargieRose is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.