Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
You the one who goes on and on about knowing how god thinks.
Again the very small is imprecise or fuzzy, not the macroscopic or very large, not what you claim wrongly is the "real world.
When did I ever claim Fuzzy logic should be used on the human scale, or I should use it?
Boxcarian logic here on the human scale is what is fuzzy. Your post is meaningless. Come back when you are not so fuzzy, Dimmy
|
So, the scientists who use Fuzzy Logic aren't human?
Also, you did use Fuzzy Logic in an attempt to show that the Laws of Logic are invalid. Are you this senile that you have forgotten what you have done already?
And the real world is this world in which human thought and human communications take place. Therefore, this real world must be governed by the Laws of Logic, that were systematized in Classical Logic, to make rational and intelligent communication possible.
But you are a prime example of a caged quantum mechanics lab rat who is incapable of discerning what is real and what is merely theoretical. If this isn't the real world, then your precious beloved fuzzy logic in your quantum mechanics world should be able to rationally explain and make sense for us these kinds of statements:
"The water is dry today."
Or
"I can't read or write anything in English."
Or
"All dogs and some dogs are black."
Or
"Sparky sleeps well every night on his nice soft, fluffy bed of rocks."
Or
"The flame from the blow torch felt cool to the touch."
Since Fuzzy Logic, apparently, is real logic in the real world of quantum mechanics and the end all and be all of all logic and beats the living tar out of all the classical laws of logic in this make-believe, macroscopic world, then Shirley, Spooky, you should be able to make rational sense of all these statements and explain them to us, apart from any great deal of cerebral Entanglement with them either. These kinds or statements should pose no problem to you whatsoever because great, god-like minds embrace, relish and love these kinds of contradictions!