Quote:
Originally Posted by wiretowire68
has the best chemist in the world in a world of truths and rumors. However, if you were one of the sport of king types with nothing but money and you want the best 2 yr. old and 3 yr. old trainer in the world then you go to him. The man trains his horses to go fast and he is probably the best gate trainer in the history of the game. That being said, cheating is cheating and everyone knows he is a cheat like so many.
|
ROFL
Have you looked up the definition of "cheat" lately ???
"...act dishonestly or unfairly in order to gain an advantage... "
Despite all of those microscopic and sloppy overages, has there been even one which documented any "advantage" gained
by the overages and not merely because he's better than most every other trainer alive?
Furthermore, how is it, that despite your having caught him "cheating" on so many occasions, the performances by his horses just keep getting better and better?
The age-old measure of an actual "cheater" in this game is that his/her win percentage dives considerably once the so-called "cheating" is unearthed.
That while Baffert's win percentage has remained steady in recent times, and is much better than it once was.
Upon first trying the Thoroughbred ranks, Baffert won with 15 of his first 48 TB starters, all more than 40 years ago.
Now again, where is the
unfair advantage, and how come you've been too inept to be able to unearth it despite 40+ years of study?
