for all your comments.
I have received some samples in the mail, and more will possibly come in the next couple of days. One thing I will however make clear, it is NOTHING EVEN CLOSE to the systems/methods you all have talked about until now including those discussed by Dave in his post.
I have racing to attend the next four days but I am so charged with this discovery that I have decided to take an off and devote all four days to find out whether I have really stumbled onto the proverbial "Philosopher's stone" or whether, as you all unanimously believe, I am just chasing a mirage.
One thing however I will say, at least as of now, the thing holds incredible promise. I have applied it to 19 betting data samples (winning and losing both) and IN EVERY SINGLE CASE this formula "improved" the performance of the sample to an "incredible" extent.
I am aware making such outrageous claims on a public forum without offering a sample or proof is bad manners, but I would rather satisfy myself fully before handling all queries/questions/objections.
Please send all samples to my mail address
dynamic.handicapper@gmail.com and wait for 3-4 more days to find out more about this.
In the meanwhile, I request you all to raise as many objections as possible so that my claim, after the scruitiny, can be put to acid test.
