Quote:
Originally Posted by ranchwest
What data are you using?
|
I made that post at 3am so I know I was a bit bold with the "I'll buy it right now" statement in my rummy condition, as I'm certain the data to input into the software is the key, and the true expense. I've never even thought of purchasing software and doing a search like that until early this morning. I saw Dave replied also, so I would guess whatever data provider he uses would do the trick. I'm certainly not scanning through hundreds of charts at the end of each day to find "lost rider" comments.
BTW, Fulton Street in the 5th at GP is one I wouldn't play. After losing the jock, he did make a nice far turn move, but then straightening for home he went very wide and finished mid-pack, closer to the outer than inner rail. Really, I can't think of a better example than the Gerlach's one that I mentioned in my OP. And as rare as it happens, the previous winners I've found have all finished their riderless race pretty much the same way, as if the jockey were hardly necessary.
