Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
Your argument against agnosticism was it was self-defeating because the agnostic must know something about god to even deny any knowledge of god.
An Apologetic word game by Norman G.(sorry forgot his name)
So let me guess, "how can anyone be absolutely certain of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
Ta.....  ....dum |
Geisler is Norm's last name. And it's no word game. Total Agnosticism is self-refuting because in order to make a
rational, meaningful statement about man's inability to know God or God's inability to make himself known, one must have some real knowledge about that which is unknown or unknowable. But if one does have some real knowledge, then total agnosticism contradicts itself.
On the other hand, if one admits to having no real knowledge of God, then the philosophy is meaningless. At best, it is pure conjecture. At worst, a laughable absurdity.
