Quote:
Originally Posted by Light
Tell me, does PA practice totalitarianism? PA has banned many people. Why don't you claim totalitarianism when PA bans people? Neither Twitter nor PA are covered by the first amendment. That doesn't make either totalitarian.
|
I'm an honest guy.
I'd prefer no one get banned unless they are abusive to other members, but no one has ever been abusive to me. I've had some heated debates. I've probably said a few things I'd rather take back, but mostly I think I'm respectful. Most people have been respectful to me and I can handle the occasional dig in the debates.
I don't read every thread and every post. So I don't know what promoted other bans. But I know "Pace" personally and I know he's a good guy and very reasonable. So if he banned some people it probably wasn't because of their opinions. It was more than that.
I resent twitter banning opinions. It's their right as a private company and it's my right to say adios and get my political news elsewhere and my horse racing news here. But it's totalitarian to ban opinions, prevent people from downloading certain APPs, take away their ability to accept payment for their opinions etc.. That's where the left is taking us.
