Perhaps it would help if the original poster participated a little more in this thread...by at least telling us what he considers a "slump" to be, in the first place. All constructive debate should begin by first accurately defining the pertinent terms used in the discussion. What many call a "slump" is often nothing more than the normal variance fluctuations inherent in all the gambling games in existence. When the gambler has as low a winning percentage as the horseplayer has...then the "slump" is the natural order of things, instead of the rarity that it's often made out to be.
__________________
"Theory is knowledge that doesn't work. Practice is when everything works and you don't know why."
-- Hermann Hesse
|