Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pandy
These angles never worked, because they're not based on any sort of handicapping logic. Not trying to be condescending, just saying, a lot of so-called handicapping angles are absurd. I remember when people used to bet "beaten favorites", for instance. Even a good angle, for example, I love "blinkers on", still has to be evaluated for each horse.
|
Yet many of the top handicappers highlight the Formulator statistics in their selections. Isn't that the same thing? They don't consider each horse as an individual. An angle might work 25% of the time for a trainer, but that's 75% of the time that it
doesn't .
