07-01-2018, 10:16 PM
|
#31
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: st louis
Posts: 2,987
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
This gal learns fast...but will she be able to fool many people? Here's an excerpt from an interview with our new, up and coming commie-light by Chuck Todd. Gotta love what the MM will let socialist pigs get away with:
“Let me talk about some of your policy positions but generally. First, explain this to me. You were endorsed by a group, the Democratic Socialists,” Todd prefaced in the middle of the interview. “What is your definition of democratic socialist?” He also boasted to her about how The New York Times had a headline touting millennials turning to socialism.
As what often happens when a Democrat is asked to define socialism in non-scary and untruthful terms, she stumbled out of the gate:
Well, for me, again, and – and – there’s so much focus on this endorsement, but I also think it's important -- an important part of my strategy in winning was building a broad-based coalition of people. So while there is a focus on this one aspect of the coalition, and to me, you know, to answer your question, the definition of democratic socialism, to me, again, is the fact that in a modern, moral, and wealthy society, no American should be too poor to live.
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb...-sell-it-older
Naturally, her solution to that is to rob Peter to pay Paul.
|
Translation: If you do not want to work, the government will send you a nice healthy monthly check, courtesy of the US taxpayers.
__________________
You will never achieve 100% if 99% is okay!
|
|
|