Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
I believe it on the basis of scripture.
|
Which proves nothing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
The doctrine of the resurrection, the prophecies pertaining to the resurrection, etc. are all in the scriptures and they all haromonize [sic] quite nicely -- not violating any laws of logic and even satisfying the principle behind Occam's razor.
|
I'll address this one in a separate post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
It something cannot be observed by the 5 senses, then it's not physical.
|
So the following are not physical? - Atoms
- Gamma rays
- X-rays
- Quarks
- Electrons
- Neutrinos
- Black holes
- Gravity
- Magnetism
- Time
- Space
- Etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
But the resurrection was falsifiable and tested by first century believers. I believe they're called eye witnesses.
|
- You've come full circle. Back to scripture which proves nothing.
- You can't produce your eye witnesses because they have been dead for almost 2000 years. How inconvenient for you.
- Eyewitnesses are the least reliable form of evidence. Ask any scientist.
__________________
Sapere aude
Last edited by Actor; 04-17-2021 at 04:14 PM.
|
