Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost
What was the Uranium One scandal? Of course it was nothing, but what it supposedly was, was that Hillary Clinton approved the transfer of US Uranium to a Russian company in exchange for bribes from the Russians through her family's Foundation.
Of course this all ignores that at least nine other agencies also had to approve the transfer and that there is no proof that any of the donations to the Clinton Foundation personally benefited any of the Clintons. It's just that you all want it to be true so badly.
What does this current, real, scandal have to do with the fake Uranium One scandal. Absolutely nothing!
Mark Lambert bribed (allegedly) Russian officials to obtain contracts to transport nuclear material from Russia to the United States. The material in question was civilian grade nuclear material legally being transported. The crime comes with the bribery.
There is no way that this indictment has any connection with the phony Uranium One scandal. One involved uranium leaving the United States (it wasn't) The other involved uranium coming into the United States (it was legally)
One involved a private citizen of the USA possibly breaking the law. The other involved numerous government officials working within the law.
One (falsely) claimed bribery originating in Russia and coming to the United States. The other actually involved bribery originating in the United States going to Russia.
Is there any evidence that Mark Lambert has any connection to the Clintons?
|
William Campbell-whistleblower was gagged by Holder, Lynch, has not testified yet.
DOJ-Lynch, Yates, Ohr, Carlin, L.Page
FBI-Comey, McCabe, Baker, Preistap, Strzok
Fusion GPS-Simpson, Steele, Clinton, Jacoby, N. Ohr
All guilty. All connected.
