Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Light
That study is obviously a bit too small in its sample to be written in stone, but you can get my point. ANYONE CAN BEAT TLG.
|
As I said in my prior post, I'd like this thread to remain free of clutter, especially your nonsensical clutter.
A) you're going to base another conclusion on three days of data? This kind of thinking makes your other Saratoga "conclusion" even LESS reliable under that kind of "Light"
B) you're still too chicken to take me up on my offer, as everyone can see
C) your PROXY cmoore, whom I believe you called one of the best around the Internet...well, I don't need to tell you...just look at the numbers after three days.
The fact that you have the balls to jump in here after three days of CMOORE sucking even more than TLG is amazing.
Don't bother to respond. It will be deleted, as I've already said, no clutter.
