Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DeltaLover
I am trying to say that all forms of gambling have enough communalties allowing them to be treated homeomorphically to a certain extend.
This means that we can define rules and behaviors that are applicable to BJ, horses and baccarat regardless of their obvious differences...
sorry, I got confused...
|
Why not tell us what "homeomorphically" means, or are we supposed to look it up in Websters? I've never even seen that word before, much less it's meaning.
Almost anything can be said to have certain things in common, that has very little to do with putting money down on a horse or horses, hopefully with some degree of confidence. In black jack you're not playing against every player in a pool, only against the dealer's hand, without busting out, and the inherent house odds. If you know how to count and don't push it too hard with bet increases over the moon and get banned, you can beat BJ enough to be profitable. Horse racing has hundreds more variables than BJ, the 2 "games" are not on the same level at all, IMHO.
