Quote:
Originally Posted by incoming
Patrick Michaels,a climatologist, who disagrees with the 31 computer models that are used to predict the climate change debacle. He gives an in depth interview with Mark Levin. He is in favor of the Russian model which is much less severe.
He also explains politicalization of climate change. It all started when President FDR wanted to improve American's diet and improve crop production using science. It revolved into a debate about nuclear energy and climate change. If you are still on the fence about climate change his rebuttals offer a lot of common sense answers .
For myself, it describes how government gets involved in something with good intentions and it spins completely out of control. In most cases term limits would solve the problem.
Calm discussion at the link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frviKqDWRl4 |
He is one of the few climatologists who disagrees with the overwhelming scientific consensus that it will be much
worse than he claims.
That consensus stands at 97%. Wonder if this has anything to do with it.
Clientele
Michaels' firm does not disclose who its clients are, but leaked documents have revealed that several were power utilities which operate coal power stations. On a 2007 academic CV, Michaels disclosed that prior to creating his firm he had received funding from the Edison Electric Institute and the Western Fuels Association. He has also been a frequent speaker with leading coal and energy companies as well as coal and other industry lobby groups.[4]
