Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
Huh? How does that make sense? Who spoke out against whom here? Who is goring the ox here?
|
Quote:
|
So given that scenario it would behoove attacking any judge who you feel might vote against your position. Just throw anything out there and the judge will have to recuse.
|
I completely agree with both of you.
Just passing on what my friend said.
Does anyone know if there is a precedent for this or anything like it?
Just a thought... If there is no precedent, imagine that the high court might have to hear arguments on who should be recused before a particular case represented by the ACLU could be heard.
And the thick plottens.
