Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FocusWiz
... My guess is that a 2% decrease in takeout would not be noticed by the general public and would not attract new business. It might increase the wagers of the 80% of the "non-rebaters" but I question whether that increase in handle would be sufficient to offset the reduction in wagering by the "rebaters."
My other guess is that many of the "rebaters" who are able to achieve a 10% rebate are using the rebate as a cushion to either offset small losses or ensure a significant return. If they are somewhat sophisticated in how they handle their money, losing the rebate will more likely encourage them to invest elsewhere.
|
If there is any decrease in takeout % wouldn't the odds in general be higher?
