Quote:
|
Originally Posted by reckless
I agree with ArlJim about her implosion. This will pave the way for the only two candidates that could win for the Democrats in 2016: Jim Webb and Al Gore. I mentioned this possibility earlier and I still stand by this prediction.
|
Sanders is getting more press and bigger crowds than Hillary. And there is more and more in the mainstream media about Biden as the anti-Hillary. Lots of speculation about him announcing, possibly next month.
From the Washington Post:
Quote:
|
In a lot of ways, Biden would be the true anti-Hillary. He is completely uninhibited, he is impossible to script — which makes him seem authentic — and he has a human appeal that everyone can relate to. Clinton, on the other hand, is running a surreal campaign that avoids crowds, media and spontaneity of any kind. She is protecting her lead in the most standard, unimaginative way possible. Compared with Clinton’s robotic, stiff approach, could having a reputation for occasionally saying the wrong thing and hugging too much work to Biden’s advantage in an era where voters want the real thing?
|
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...oment-arrived/
From the Washington Times:
Quote:
Vice President Joseph R. Biden’s team is putting out the word that he is leaning in favor of joining the presidential race next month, according to a prominent Democratic fundraiser.
The veep’s entrance would dramatically shake up the Democratic contest, confronting front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton with a formidable opponent who is equally well-known across the country and poised to tap a network of major donors.
“They have given increasingly strong signals that Biden is going to throw his hat in the ring,” said New York businessman Jon Cooper, a top bundler for President Obama’s 2012 campaign who has been testing the waters with fellow bundlers for a Biden run.
|
