Quote:
Originally Posted by the little guy
Your ridiculous posting is impressive.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by the little guy
... BS you post here. Imagine if you had to be personally accountable. You have trouble getting ANYTHING right.
You can't even get the basics correct. The financials of running two racetracks less than ten miles apart don't make sense. This shouldn't be too hard to figure out...even for you. We all love Aqueduct, but it doesn't make sense. What does make sense is building a new Belmont, as the current one doesn't work.
|
OK, talk about
ridiculous posting:
(or somebody
towing the company line in the face of common sense)
"Shouldn't be too hard to figure out" ???
LOL - for how long has the same company been running "two racetracks less than ten miles apart"??
And yet it has taken that long for them and their minions to figure out that "the financials"... "don't make sense" ??
"We all" definitely do not "love Aqueduct".
Its dying slogan should still read:
"The Breeders' Cup was held here... (once)"
And how is it that "Belmont" "doesn't work" ???
It appears to have been working fine ever since they last ran the Belmont Stakes at Aqueduct, and probably long before.
Chief among those things which "shouldn't be too hard to figure out" remains the harsh reality that each time you open the doors for a live race day, you further erode horse racing. That by drawing still more innocent, (could-have-once-been
future regulars) into the quasi
shell game which you are presently operating or
tacitly approving/endorsing by your doing nothing other than
towing the company line.
It will be only at the point which you and yours first consent to actively do something for your on-site customers that you will cease to steadily erode what once was a grand sport. In the present you simply can't become any part of the solution until you first cease to be
the problem.
It
"shouldn't be too hard to figure out" that the public at large
wants no part of your shell game. They in greatest numbers take one look, watch it happen, and show enough common sense to avoid it for their entire future. Much as would anybody walking past a shell game in Times Square.
You caused all of this yourselves - much as was the case in Arlington Heights, Boston, Miami Gardens, San Mateo, and soon to occur in Albany and in Phoenix.
Once again, you can not be any part of the solution until you cease to be (or
represent, in your case) most of the problem.
That, also, "
shouldn't be too hard to figure out".
Anything about "two racetracks less than ten miles apart" that "doesn't work" in the 2023 present, yet which sure seemed to work fine for decades before
is entirely a function of the poor customer-facing aspect of the company whose narrative you continue to spew (without so much as bothering to take the
two seconds perhaps needed for most "to figure out").
So c'mon,
"it shouldn't be too hard (for you) to figure out"
