Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOracle
Well for that matter you could say that for everything. People who play horses that won in the past bet them again hoping they win in the future
Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't so using your logic that applies to almost everyone
|
There are ways to do it better. For example, you split the samples and test each separately. But you need big sample size for that.
I'm not trying to be a jerk here, I've got a lot of experience with this stuff. There is something to be said for catching a trainer when he is hot and using short term trends, but the posts I see you make are almost all at the too late stage. Just my opinion.
