|
Several things don't make sense to me.
1. The number of guns he had at the hotel. No matter how many people he intended to kill and no matter how many backup guns he needed to hold off the police or because some were jamming during the act, he still had way too many guns. That goes double if he intended to try to escape. He was going to leave behind an arsenal of evidence. Yet, he (or someone) went out of their way to not leave behind much if any evidence on his laptop computer (Evidence: Disassembled laptop computer missing hard drive (on floor). That's way too inconsistent. You don't give a crap about all the guns in the room but you go out of your way to not leave an electronic trail on your computer?
2. The idea they he made a lot money gambling on slot machines is somewhere between extremely unlikely and so laughably impossible you'd have to be an idiot to believe it. That's a pretty narrow and unlikely rage. MASSIVELY MORE LIKELY is that he was engaged in some sort of illegal behavior and used gambling winnings as a way of converting his illegal income to legal status.
This case screams that something MUCH more complex was going on that is now being covered up.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
Last edited by classhandicapper; 01-01-2019 at 10:26 AM.
|
