Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost
If you have a tweet, such as the one posted by FanDan and the tweet contains a link to a video, is it not logical to assume that the video further explains the tweet.
In this case, the tweet was about Mr. Justice Breyer's dissent and the video was an explanation of his view of the 2nd amendment.
There are a lot of examples of folks posting links without explanation (most of them by those on the right of the political spectrum) this is not one of them.
|
Correct, and I never post links without an explanation, as Clocker purports. It's just his lame, bullshit excuse for ignoring the material in the links.
He's also a hypocrite with his "partisan" claim, since he frequently posts links from Breitbart, the Blaze, Zero Hedge, PJ Media, and various other nutball outlets.
