|
I listened to it.
I disagreed with that call. I appreciate how hard the job is. People want consistency, and right now they cant figure out their own rules.
You cant take McKinzie down and not take that horse down.
I would say in general CHRB has been better about taking horses down when fouls have occurred. In other jurisdictions there is some serious herding down the stretch and bumping out of the gates.
They should change it a foul is a foul, would clean a lot of this up and there would be zero ambiguity.
|
