Quote:
Originally Posted by CheckMark
Thanks Tom!
So what you are saying is I need a bigger sample size in order to be more broader and more general? But as the meet goes on would the data for the RACES be a significance?
|
I think he was saying that instead of grading horses in that race, you should instead grade the races. So instead of just doing the running style stuff for that horse in a race, instead grade the races that are run.
For example, if a race that pops up the most at Woodbine (like CLM 7.5k 6F on the tapeta) you should be grading that instead. That way when that same conditions go again, you can go back and look at how those races ran at that condition.
