Quote:
Originally Posted by tucker6
You want fake science?
Here's a quote on the polarbearsinternational.org site:
Without action on climate change, scientists predict we could lose wild polar bears by 2100.
Two-thirds could be gone by 2050.
And sea ice loss from human activity is the cause.
Meanwhile in realityville, we have the following:
This means the adjusted 2015 global estimate for polar bears should be about 28,500 (average), a marked increase over the official estimate of 26,500 (average) for 2015 — and an even larger increase over the 2005 estimate of about 22,500 (average)2, despite the dramatic loss of summer sea ice since 2007 that we hear about endlessly.
https://polarbearscience.com/2017/02...-almost-30000/
So on the one hand, an Alarmist group says polar bears are all gonna die this century, and on the other hand, the people actually counting the polar bears say they are healthier than ever and growing in population.
 |
I'm sure you thought you "got me" but you didn't. Your "realityville" is a blog written by someone who was on the payroll of the Heartland Institute.
The Heartland Institute denies global warming, among other things. In the 1990's they worked with tobacco giant Phillip Morris. They actually question the link between smoking, second hand smoke and cancer. That's not a joke, they actually believe that.
So even if you want to be dumb and deny the science behind climate change and global warming....I'd think no one at this point can deny the link between smoking and cancer.
So while the blog author might be an expert of sorts, she's essentially paid to deny climate change. Conflict of interest much?
