Quote:
Originally Posted by BarchCapper
I find it at least a little intriguing that the leading jock's agent had him staying with the horse after 2 performances like that AND no history at all with the new trainer (according to the info I have).
|
excellent point. any rides for this trainer would be cool, but that brings us back to the oddity that they do not show a working relationship.
Also, IDK whether the previous listed ownership is any connection to current team... private sale, etc...
I don't know whether the trainer/owner barn is the betting party in this case, or if it's the jockey's team. Also not privy to the will-pays etc to know the full picture of betting extent.
it is common knowledge this jock is no stranger to the $50.00 window. It would be no surprise if this jock routinely shared information with a syndicate.
