https://www.richarddawkins.net/2012/...er-of-science/ ...
What would Aguazul, Dawkins' apostle and worshiper of "capital S" science and "capital M" mathematical thought, say about the use of "heart" when discussing man? "Just because metaphorical thought isn’t like Scientific or Mathematical thought doesn’t mean it is wrong or useless".
I need no further confirmation for what I accept as the fundamental explanation of reality, from which all else flows, save for gaining access to levels of depth that may be allowed me. However, even if I were completely swayed to the materialist camp, I would run in horror from the utterly formal, staid, exacting, quantifying, rigid, definition-requiring, lab-coat-as-straitjacket types for one reason alone.
Boredom.
