Quote:
Originally Posted by maddog42
|
Krugman is a dolt. He says:
Quote:
|
circumstantial evidence that a hostile foreign power may have colluded with a U.S. presidential campaign, and may retain undue influence at the highest levels of our government.
|
What evidence of collusion? Were the Dems hacked? Yes. Is there any evidence of Trump or GOP collusion? Haven't seen any.
And he says:
Quote:
|
At this point, in other words, almost an entire party appears to have decided that potential treason in the cause of tax cuts for the wealthy is no vice. And that’s barely hyperbole.
|
The administration and the GOP want to continue an investigation by the FBI under new leadership, not by a special prosecutor. How is that treason?
And it is obvious that Krugman and the other moonbats haven't a clue what treason is. Treason is the only crime defined in the Constitution:
Quote:
|
Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.
|
We are not at war with Russia. Russia has not attacked us. Russia is not legally an enemy. And while the hacking appears to have been done by Russians, there is as of yet no evidence that it was done by the Russian government.
There are a lot of reasons to criticize Trump and the GOP. This is not one of them. People who harp on this are just destroying their own credibility.
