Quote:
Originally Posted by MutuelClerk
The game was awful. Both those teams should have lost two weeks ago. One idiot lines up offside on an interception and the other game the Refs miss a PI call. How much better would the game have been if it was the Saints and the Chiefs? A TON.
The Pats won in spite of Brady. GOAT? No way. HOF? for sure. He has played under the best coach ever it pains me to say. Right place. Right time. I believe a lot of upper echelon QB's would have just as many Super bowl wins as Brady if they played under Belichick.
As far as Romo goes. He's a Cowboy so as a player I couldn't stand him. As an announcer. He's very good at telling you the play as they line up. Much better announcer than player and he was a decent player.
The game stunk. The commercials stunk. Ad executives are highly overpaid. The halftime show I've lost touch with pop culture and it kinda stunk too. Thank God for Netflix and a DVR.
Oh yeah, stay off my lawn...  |
I'll second you just about everywhere in your post.
Especially about my lawn!
One comment about Brady. Had he lost this game by something like 41-13 like Peyton lost to the Seahawks (43-8) in 2015 or John Elway lost to the Redskins in 1988 (42-10), we could have been spared a lot of post-game media horse manure.
