Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
The operative term in my last post to you was "legal". Now go back are CAREFULLY read Mat 27:3-10 to see if there's any term in that passage that correlates with "legal".
The second thing you want to ask yourself is this: Did the chief priests want to take their money back?
The third thing you want ask your ego is this: Did the chief priests keep the "blood money"?
The fourth thing you want to ask is this: If they didn't keep the money, why?
The fifth thing to ask is this: If they didn't keep the money, what did they do with it?
What is wrong with you skeptics (yes, you are one, too, Mr. Light)!? If you can't intelligently handle a short passage consisting of only 8 verses, what makes you think for a moment that you have any inkling whatsoever of what the bible's story and gospel message are!?
|
But what does that have to do with refuting my statement that you responded to ?