Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
Geisler is Norm's last name. And it's no word game. Total Agnosticism is self-refuting because in order to make a rational, meaningful statement about man's inability to know God or God's inability to make himself known, one must have some real knowledge about that which is unknown or unknowable. But if one does have some real knowledge, then total agnosticism contradicts itself.
On the other hand, if one admits to having no real knowledge of God, then the philosophy is meaningless. At best, it is pure conjecture. At worst, a laughable absurdity.
|
Here we have an "argument" that attempts to defend a word game with yet another laughable display of semantic ambiguity that in no way supports the conclusion that agnosticism is self refuting.
