Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 05-25-2022, 10:58 AM   #11
mountainman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bustin Stones View Post
One big saving of racing has been interstate wagering. However, when you involve interstate commerce, you invite fed oversight. This is true in every industry. It's a catch22. If state run tracks decide to stop taking wagers from outside the state, the drop in revenue kills their game. If states decide to pay for the extra oversight, the added expense may shut down smaller circuits, Contraction will follow either decision. Or we can scrap the whole idea of fed oversight and play it cheap. And accept whatever each state commission believes is fair to fans. Even though racing is conducting interstate commerce.
If you believe fed bureaucracy is both incompetent AND evil, you would oppose oversight. I choose to believe the fed is just incompetent.
Good post.
mountainman is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.