Quote:
Originally Posted by Show Me the Wire
Wasting my time here. Let me clarify your understanding of my position. It is inappropriate to conduct an investigation without evidence of wrong doing. The use of a commercial communications app. to conduct non-classified government business is not proper subject matter for a house oversight committee.
I have a problem with the abusive use of investigations. A white House adviser is not above the law, but is neither below the law and the use of a communications app should not be investigated absent evidence of a crime.
Anyone who believes in the rule of law and U.S. citizen rights should object to any investigation of the use of a legal commercial communication app, White House adviser or not, absent the evidence of wrong doing.
|
This is what they do in RUSSIA. And also, as many dems are arguing today - a person has to be cleared of suspicions and innuendo through investigations.
What happened to presumed innocent?
