After posting here for a while, it's pretty clear that the poster Rsetup was high on this horse for reasons that align with his personal philosophy of modeling and analyzing races.
If you aren't aware of that, at least give him credit for copying the correct 'experts'. Handicapping those guys is at least as hard as handicapping a horse race with 3 or 4 logicals.
I have no problem admitting that he was right, and I was very wrong about the race. I made about 140 on a race that should have been a month's worth of profit. Not only did I key Always Dreaming roughly five times as much as Cloud Computing, I only had Classic Empire on one of my Cloud Computing keys (with otherwise correct additional trifecta and superfecta tickets that tossed Classic Empire from 1st through 3rd). I also didn't bet a dime in multi-races. I was so biased about Classic Empire, that I was blind to some of the types of scenarios that Rsetup spelled out.
I'm not ever going to scanning the internet to bet Rsetup's (or any other poster's) selections, but there are a handful of guys at this site who consistently offer quality insights. One of the reason this site thrives, even with the existence of things like Facebook.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullet Plane
Well...
Jim Dunleavy in the DRF picked Cloud Computing.
Andy Serling had him.
If you read the Sheets Bulletin Board, a handicapper there picked him.
Just do a little reading, plenty of experts picked the horse.
I give no "copy cat" on this board or any other.
any kudo's for copy cat picks.
Matter of fact, it makes me more than a little angry.
It is the equivalent of trolling.
Please kick all the damn useless trolls off the board!!!!
Question?
This troll isn't Vic Stauffer, or is he?
|
