07-21-2016, 03:50 PM
|
#72
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Benton, La.
Posts: 1,841
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
Light,
To be fair, many of these users are not really playing to beat the world. Sure, they want to be competitive, but their agendas are not the same as guys like you and me.
That is not to say that someone cannot figure out a way to win long-term with such a program, but the typical player is just not going to hand-test 3,000 races to make sure it works before trying it with real money. (And why should they?)
IMHO, the important thing here is that the design of the software clearly fits into the mindset of a great many handicappers (as does the price). Personally, I like the way the data is formatted.
If I were to say that there is no empirical proof of the validity of the method(s), factors, etc., a logical response would be, "So what?"
Dave
|
If I can make 4% ROI at the end of the month I am happy. I combine that with my rebate money and I make about 10% of what I bet. The way I bet, that smokes and beer money.
|
|
|