Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
Medical science is loathe to be wrong. It would destroy their credibility in the eyes of the public. So...how medical science self-protects is by recommending (in the name of "science", of course) stringent guidelines, such as masking (very dubious value), social distancing, universal testing, etc..
As stated earlier, they place themselves into a win-win situation with this kind of policy. If the infection numbers, fatality numbers, etc. come in much lower than what the doomers and gloomers predicted, they pat themselves on the back showing how effective their strict guidelines were. On the other hand, if their predictions take a big turn south and the numbers are worse than originally imagined, they still pat themselves on the back, assuring everyone the numbers would even be worse still if it hadn't been for the strict guidelines in the first place.
Win-Win!
I have a question for you Mr, Know-it-All: What is the primary objective this nation's lockdown: Is it to minimize fatalities or to minimize infections? Which is it?  |
Not only are you a conspiracy theorist politically, you think everyone on the religious threads have conspired against you and your god. With the help of the devil.
I don't take word you say seriously
