Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp
These sorts of hypocrisy arguments don't do much for me.
It's like saying to the politician who supports campaign finance reform, "why are you taking those big donations, you hypocrite!". As long as the rules permit practically unlimited use of raceday Lasix as a doping agent and performance enhancer, you have to give it to your horse, no matter how you feel about it.
|
This is actually a poor analogy in this case. It is not a Lasix optional argument we are discussing. TSG offered a weight break to those willing to run without Lasix, and like the others in the race, the entrants from TSG believe the weight break isn't worth not running with Lasix. I'm not knocking them, in fact I agree with them, but just pointing it out.
I should add, your wording about why Lasix is allowed does not transfer well to your supposed skills as a lawyer. Any judge would throw that argument where it belongs, in the trash. Try sticking to the facts. It's generally useful in debates...even occasionally on the internet.
