Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


View Single Post
Old 03-14-2017, 05:42 PM   #24
HalvOnHorseracing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by tucker6 View Post
everything. They are redundant with the states. I'd keep 10% of the employees around to ensure the states are applying the federal laws appropriately, but I'd get rid of 90% of them. The EPA should not be an advocate for anything. They are a watchdog only and should apply themselves as such.
There is a reason why I am intimately familiar with what the EPA does, what the states do, and how they interact.

EPA functions in accordance with the federal enabling statutes. That makes them statutorily required to advocate for Congress' mandates. You might want to check out the Clean Air Act or the Clean Water Act sometime to see what Congress thinks EPA's job is.

You should listen to this story. It's 11 minutes of your life, but it really explained for me some of your posts.

http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2017/...th-tom-nichols
HalvOnHorseracing is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
 
» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Which horse do you like most
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.